Menu Content/Inhalt
Home arrow More in Reviews... arrow The Adjustment - Generic

Login Form






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Syndicate

Newsflash


The Adjustment - Generic | Print |  E-mail
Written by Ronnie Pirate   
Friday, 02 June 2006
ImageThe Generic Theater closes this anniversary season with Mike Folie’s The Adjustment. It is a tale of two individuals who struggle to maintain their beliefs, either political or religious in the midst of pressure from the system, which they begin to question. It is a very complex piece to stage, cast, and direct.

The challenge comes from the fact that this is an issue play, more intellectual than action, and building up suspense for “ideas” can be more difficult than creating tension for external conflicts. The debate for the characters, and their resulting change is so personal, that what glimpses of it that can be seen have to be very carefully crafted. Director DENIS MALONE has crafted some very interesting moments in his production.

Just to backtrack a bit, the story concerns a politician/lobbyist Sharon Gray, played by CAITLIN MARIE CURREY, who develops feelings for a married conservative Jewish Chiropractor, Mathew Cohen, played by CASEY DONTAI BRAXTON. Due to a crush and possible sudden feeling of charity, Gray seeks to help Cohen’s failing practice. Cohen, also attracted to Gray, enjoys their philosophical debates and gradually begins flirting back. The question is whether either character will compromise their beliefs, and livelihoods. Both performers deliver; however, Currey’s Gray is the crowd pleaser with her frenetic performance and control of the stage. The cast is rounded out by CLIFFORD HOFFMAN, who plays multiple rolls as needed to advance the plot. All three performers are great at what they do, and interesting to watch at all times. They have great chemistry, and

I have to admit, I got a bit sniffly towards the show's conclusion

I have to admit, I got a bit sniffly towards the show's conclusion.

I was impressed with the very thoughtfully designed production. The floor was painted in a wavering striped American flag, with an empty battlefield. The stars were the Star of David, scattered over the stripes. Several murals decorate the back walls. All of these choices are well fitted to the themes Malone emphasizes, and served well the various locales in the play, which I’ll refrain from discussing to not spoil the plot. Design credits represent the work of AMY REPAK and Denis Malone.

Malone has created an interesting and entertaining piece, full of energy and levity that befits his cast. His choices, interpretation, and staging show a bold, emerging director, unafraid to say what he has to say. This is exactly what the Generic started out doing, and hopefully what they will return to if they manage to have future seasons (see upcoming article for more). Still, I’m not sure that Folie would approve of Malone’s take. Both actors are much younger than their characters, which loses the dry wit, and humor of the written script. Malone compensates by having the actors crank up the physicality and shtick of every situation; the choice is entertaining, but Folie did not write a sitcom. These characters do not carry the weight, convictions, and weariness that their middle-aged experiences have brought upon them. That makes this a very different story. Having said that, The Adjustment is worth attending, not only for the show, but because it could be the last thing the Generic does. The loss of the Generic would require an adjustment in itself.

 

comments

Good Morning Tidewater

Just thought I'd give everyone a heads-up, possible good news or bad news depending on your feelings type of declaration.

The good news: The Generic will stay at it's current facility for possibly another year.

The bad news: They still have a board of directors.

Posted by Nancy Rowlands, on 06/20/2006 at 06:43

The Adjustment was a beautiful play not just about religion and politics but about how people can change each other for the better. Caitlin Currey lit up the stage with an enchanting way of taking in the audience and never letting them go even when the play was over, she honestly has the presence of film legend “Bette Davis”. But the play was imaginative, funny and had moments with overwhelming emotional drive that can only be brought to you by a Director (Denis Malone) who cares for his work like he would his child. With love, respect and knowing what’s best.

Posted by JACOB, on 06/17/2006 at 09:13

I saw this show four times and every performance I got more upset and cried even harder. I honestly can say that I hated this show but was uncontrollably drawn to it.--Mary

Posted by Mary Goldstein, whose homepage is here on 06/12/2006 at 05:48

I chose to wait in posting until after the final curtain call of The Adjustment prior to posting on this forum. I have seen the show, in total, roughly a dozen times, as well as read the script just as many. I enjoyed the play on a level most audience members will never be able to achieve unless they have been in a production themselves. I, however, have not seen The Adjustment done in a larger forum, so I cannot compare notes, dissect, and examine with a keen eye the nuances that others find in a production. How could I? This is my first production.
For those who took the time to read the playbill, they would have noticed that there was an active duty member of the United States Navy as part of this crew. To be as eloquent as possible, to Barbara, I will not apologize. Only Mr. Malone could do that, and I assure you, he will not. There was no desecration of any flag. There were red, white, and blue stripes that faintly resemble the banners hung at political rallies, or the French flag flapping in the wind, but no American flag was harmed during the creation of this production. There were silver representations of the Star of David scattered throughout the set, and, since the characters were Jewish, this was thought to be appropriate. When one focuses on a single aspect of the set one misses the point of theater. You missed the show itself, and that is a tragedy. How can you judge something you, apparently, did not see, nor choose to experience?
To Lenny, please stop helping.
To Ms. O’Hare, I can only say that I taste a fine vintage of sour-grapes in the ‘subtext’ of your statement. I question if you bothered to see the show, but a shot too late, is a shot wasted, so I wish you the best in your future endeavors, whatever those may be.
I could go on, but it would be sloppy, and I think I may have gone too far as is.
However, I do wish to close with who I am. I am a recently separated member of the United States Navy, serving six years with two tours to the North Arabian Gulf. You will not find my name on any of the playbills, as I was a walk-on tech for Jonathan Bremner in the case that his current occupation required him to leave on short notice. I have only begun to experience the theater within the last year, starting with productions of Rent and Chicago at the Chrysler Hall, and a production of Golden Girls at Smith College in Northampton, MA.
Now, mayhaps, it is my novice perception of this dazzling world of theater, but wasn’t the point of a show to experience an event. To see it from a perspective other than our own, and feel sensations that we would rather not have to in our own ‘real’ lives? I heard of a lack of substance, but substance was there. It may have not been the flavor that one is accustomed to, but it was there.
Is Community Theater about trying to mimic the bigger theaters, or is a place to experiment? Perhaps, a place to try bold new things, bounce different ideas around like a racquetball in a small room before unleashing them to the public, or, maybe, a place to raise questions that we, as a society or as individuals, don’t like asking ourselves?
I believe that the cast accomplished a monumental feat by bringing these to light in a small theater. As C. Gendusa said, “you got people talking”. I am proud to have been part of this cast, and thank all those who came to see it, whether you enjoyed the show or not.

Posted by Joshua Peters, whose homepage is here on 06/11/2006 at 11:32

OK, I saw it.

Boring play, definately not worth the plethora of comments.

One question, still unanswered: Is the desecration of the American flag in the script, or directorial choice.

As an arts supporter, I am all for freedom of expression. As a veteran and an American, I would like to punch the little SOB who did it.

Have a nice day!

Posted by Phil Rinzatto, whose homepage is here on 06/11/2006 at 10:25

What an amazing response to an amazing show. I absolutely loved this production and everything that Denis Malone did with it. I think that, while the casting was younger than the Mike Folie intended, Both Caitlin Currey and Casey Braxton had the gravitas to carry heavy topics and the spunk to keep the pacing electric- middle-aged actors may very well have dragged this show into the ground. I wasn't as absolutely thrilled with Folie's script as many of you seem to be, although I must say that he does an admirable job of taking nearly every issue sure to start an argument and rolling them all together into one script. Which leads me to my next, and most important, point:

Most of the commenters below me came here because they were so inspired/outraged by this show that they needed to get it out, to have their voice heard. Whether they loved or hated the show, it got them talking, and thinking, about issues that aren't easy to deal with, and to which no one has a definite right answer. And, to me, that is what all art should aspire to do. So congratulations, Mr. Malone- you got people talking.

Posted by C. Gendusa, whose homepage is here on 06/10/2006 at 03:47

all the controversy and range of opinions about the show, along with the fact that this would be my last chance to see that theatre, motivated me to find my way over to the Generic to see the show.

I was very impressed.

Let me first say to William, who posted right before me, that you should go see the show regardless of the comments that were offensive. Everyone has different opinions about how this show could have been done better, and I am no different. I think that there were several things that i just dont believe worked, or worse cheapened the effect the writer intended.

However, the show takes chances. And in the end you find that you care about the main characters and get caught up in their emotional lives.

I am really proud of the Generic for putting on a show like this (that hasn't even been published yet) and I am proud of them for throwing caution to the wind.

So go and learn, watch the show, see the things that don't work, decide for yourself what works and what doesn't, support Dennis, and support the Generic, because there aren't alot of places where we can have the freedom to experiment and create, and i would hate to lose it.

You have two more days my friends... so go and enjoy.. and post what you think :)

Posted by PJ Freebourn, on 06/10/2006 at 09:27

You Talked Me Out of It.
You know, as an ODU student, I am really proud of Denis's work ouside of school.
I was looking forward to seeing it after reading many of the comments.
However, if Lenny is a part of the cast as he claims, then he just talked me out of it
Sorry, Denis.

Posted by William McGee, whose homepage is here on 06/10/2006 at 07:34

Mr Administrator, you are absolutely right, this kind of personal attack is ridiculous and cruel. It is one thing to 'comment with a little bit of an edge' and quite another to attack one's age or sex. Perhaps one could excuse that, but the comment about Barbara's grandfather, that's another matter. That being said, while I understand the writer's natural reaction to 'stick up for a friend,' I don't think Mr Malone (the director of The Adjustment) needs friends like Lenny.--As someone said before, 'let's keep it clean.'--Mary

Posted by Mary Reilly, whose homepage is here on 06/10/2006 at 07:26

Alright, I know that there is a ton of emotion and opinion about generic in general and this show in specific, but...
'and here is where I get really nasty'

I like having this as a place that people can freely voice their opinions, but if people start attacking one another personally, then this will become a hostile environment where only the brave or callous will voice their opinions. That is unnacceptable, and, might I say, a little childish.

I would like to be able to keep the comment boards and forums as lightly moderated as possible. However, if they become a battleground for personal animosity, our monitoring will need to increase and repeat offenders may have to be banned from posting.

So feel free to voice your opinions unless you are trying to launch a personal attack. Thank you.

-pj
Administrator
onhamptonroads.com

Posted by PJ Freebourn, on 06/09/2006 at 05:48

Well, where should I start? First, I came to the show not having read the script, so necessity of casting older actors never came to mind. Nevertheless, Carrie, Casey and Clifford successfully brought their middle-aged roles to life by playing with and stretching the range of humor and drama throughout the script. I did feel that the music over-dramatized the intended feel of some scenes, giving it a 7th Heaven aura to it. That was my only bone to pick. Denis really raised the stakes for this production and tackled it all by himself, and he did with you nay-sayers laughing in his face. I am proud of the whole group, cast and crew, who was able to tastefully and intellectually express themselves. More power to you.
P.S., and here is where I get really nasty:

Barbara, I hope you read this one day and realize that if your grandfather died in WWII, then you probably never knew the guy, so what you think about this play doesn't mean a damn thing. We appreciate what grandpa did for us, but this is just a play, not a declaration of war, so shut up. You even type like an old woman, Barbara. Go sew something, and stay out of the theatre.

My favorite was 'Syl'. Syl. That's ....cute. Of course I am kidding, and I must say that I am thoroughly impressed with your crafty skill with words. And wow, your persecutions on Denis' credibility as a director were dead on for a retard. Christopher Reeves could have been more accurate playing Pin the Tail on the Donkey than your juvenile assumptions. I have to conclude that either your parents abandonned you as a child, or you just can't , cuz only those kind of people would end their say with a quote, you cliche. Now, while you stare at this computer screen thinking of something to say, I'll be gone, maybe won't come back, unless you're good. Now, shave your pits and have fun with your hemp.
There, I have said my peace, now stay in school....especially you, Sylvia O'Hare.

UP TOP, BRING IT AROUND!!

Posted by Lenny Fluena, on 06/09/2006 at 05:00

ok now I *really* want to see the show :)

Posted by PJ Freebourn, on 06/08/2006 at 02:41

This is in reply to Ms Aames (in a kindly manner). Madelline, you are absolutely right when you say that this (The Adjustment) is a beautiful script, and that there are many subtleties inherent. However, you miss the point of many of the responders--who in my view are a little rude, by the way, but I do agree with them in principle. That beauty will never be shown in the style Mr Malone has chosen.I found myself extremely irritated with the style chosen by the director which had nothing to do with the play itself. A good style, and kudos to Mr Malone for his obvious talent. the point remains; oil and water don't mix, and neither did The Adjustment and Mr Malone's choices. I liken it to, perhaps, doing Agatha Christie's 'The Mousetrap' in Suzuki style--an interesting experiment, but can I leave without anyone seiing me?--Henry

Posted by Harry Liggett, whose homepage is here on 06/08/2006 at 06:52

'LOOK CLOSER'
It's a shame that the majority of audiences who view this show will never be aware of all the underlying meaning and beauty 'The Adjustment' at the Generic Theater embodies. This production is flooded with subliminal messages that most will only see as mere shtick and surface spectacle. Unfortunately, when a script incorporates religion and politics on any level it's inevitably going to conclude in a disagreement, but overall this isn't a script about religion and politics. This is a play about relationships, the impact they have on our lives, and the ultimate sacrifices we make for them. Folie is stressing that as a society we so often get hung up on issues that are inferior to what will always reign supreme, love. Of course, this is a commonly believed idea, although it is a rarely practiced one. Malone only exacerbates on this idea through his intellectually intuitive imagination. There is nothing more important than the impressions our lives leave on other lives. I feel torn because I don't know whether I should feel good about getting this, or sad because so many others never will. Whether you hate this play or love it you can't deny the fact that it strikes something from within and challenges you to take a long hard look at yourself and question your own values and principles and what you stand for. This is the true meaning of a successful piece of art. ---Madeline Aames

Posted by Madeline Aames, whose homepage is here on 06/07/2006 at 05:11

Have to disagree with the reviewer: having been involved with the Generic since the days when it was part of Norfolk Parks and Recs, Mr Malone's production is NOT what the Generic was like. Real substance over 'overproduction' was the order of the day. This show is exactly what the Generic was NOT about! Wish the last show would have been different. To each his own. In conclusion (on a lighter note), opinions are like ********, everyone has one! And let's remember, folks, let's not get personal in our remarks--keep it clean.

Posted by Frankie, whose homepage is here on 06/07/2006 at 06:48

Malone and company bring an entirely new innovative energy to the Hampton Roads theater district, which is so desperately needed. Hands down without a doubt a FIVE STAR SHOW!

Posted by Aaron, whose homepage is here on 06/06/2006 at 07:01

O come on folks, this was a good play ruined with immature direction (or should I say lack of it?)Why not just make every play a music video and be done with it? Mr Malone was only picked for director as a last resort when Ms Xander completely succeeded in alienating any worthwhile talent with her childish power games. Yes folks, that is the real 'subtext.' Say goodbye to the Generic, folks.What is it the bard said, 'once an adult, twice a child?'--Syl

Posted by Sylvia O'Hare, whose homepage is here on 06/06/2006 at 04:45

This production was energetic, enlightening, entertaining, and intriguing. Perhaps the actors were too young for their roles- but I did not notice. Mr. Malone obviously compensated very well, creating a production that appeals to the 'inner child.' As a young adult I related with the characters, especially Gray, as she tried to reconcile her long-held beliefs and her new insights. Caitlin Marie Currey was AMAZING. I congratulate the entire cast and most especially the director, Mr. Malone, who I predict has a very bright future.

Posted by Erin Matson, whose homepage is here on 06/06/2006 at 04:08

I can't decipher if this is a finely tweaked piece of madness or a sheer masterpiece, regardless I've never experienced a production with more heart. Thank you from the bottom of my heart. Malcolm and Eleanor

Posted by Malcolm, whose homepage is here on 06/06/2006 at 02:39

mr malone, we did not enjoy seeing the american flag desecrated in this set. my grandfather father died at omaha beach on d-day for this? when did the generic theater become a staging ground for odu students? to tell the truth, this was a clownish attempt at 'art.' nothing is more ridiculous than using chidren pose as adults. why not just stage a grade school recital, it would certainly save on royalties! we walked out; to tell the truth, because we felt cheated. mr malone, grow up!--barbara

Posted by barbara, whose homepage is here on 06/06/2006 at 06:32

Great play! - Very funny in parts and heartbreaking in others. Beautiful music and acting. Definitely worth seeing.
4 stars out of 5

Posted by Marissa S., whose homepage is here on 06/05/2006 at 11:00

Hello everyone, cheez, don't know what to say to Ellen, sorry you were so disappointed? Anyway, I saw 'the Adjustment' for what it was, an enjoyable piece of fluff, worth the entry fee, etc. Not deep drama, yes, they were 'miscast', way too young for the roles, but they did a darn fine job with what they had. I often see Gevernor's School plays, and the kids there do credible work, sometimes better than their adult peers. Anyway, I thought we were supposed to judge the production bing done, and not the theatre itself. Put simply,The Adjustment rates (in my book) 3 1/2 *'s out of 5 *'s. Go see it, if for nothing else than the nostalgia of witnessing Generic's last stand. Peace and Love--Joseph

Posted by Joseph, whose homepage is here on 06/03/2006 at 06:05

I too am sad that the Generic is closing after this season. One wonders if internal strife is not the real reason; this is not the Generic that was. Anyway, to respond to Mr. Pirate's review, yes, there were many cute moments, but we didn't 'buy' the play for a moment. The very schtik you praise was this play's downfall. A good work doesn't need jazzing up nor apologies given. I am a Catholic married to a Jewish man, so we were SO looking forward to this production. This effort simply...wasn't. We felt the same way when viewing 'Coffee With God' (which Malone directed) at the Dog Day Festival last summer: schtik over substance. Why did he feel the need to cast his school friends over adults? Why does the Generic run anyone with real artistic merit away? Not a very good last show for the Generic, but an apt harbringer of local theatre, slickness over form. ALAS.--MEL

Posted by Mary Ellen Jaskiewicz, whose homepage is here on 06/03/2006 at 04:01

 1 
Page 1 of 1 ( 23 comments )
Add comments to this article: The Adjustment - Generic ...

Enter your comment below.

Name (required)

E-Mail (optional)
Your email will not be displayed on the site - only to our administrator
Comment (supported) [BBcode]

designed by: www.crystalsolutions.net based on a template by: www.madeyourweb.com